MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071762596 · doi:10.1021/cc050090+

Peptide−Heterocycle Hybrid Molecules:  Solid-Phase Synthesis of a 400-Member Library of N-Terminal 2-Iminohydantoin Peptides

2006· article· es· W2071762596 on OpenAlexaff
Julia Gavrilyuk, Ghotas Evindar, Robert A. Batey

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChemical Synthesis and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEdman degradationChemistryPeptideTripeptideSolid-phase synthesisThioureaStereochemistryCarbodiimideMoleculePeptide synthesisCleavage (geology)AmideElectrophileCombinatorial chemistryReagentResidue (chemistry)Intramolecular forceOrganic chemistryPeptide sequenceBiochemistryCatalysisMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method for the heterocyclic modification of the N-terminus of a peptide is described. Reaction of the N-terminal amino group of solid-supported peptides with arylisothiocyanates generates a thiourea intermediate, as in the first step of Edman degradation. Treatment of the resin-supported peptide-thioureas with Mukaiyama's reagent (2-chloro-1-methylpyridinium iodide) generates an electrophilic carbodiimide functionality, which undergoes rapid intramolecular trapping by the adjacent amide group to give a 2-iminohydantoin ring at the N-terminus of the peptide. The dehydrothiolation step in the presence of Mukaiyama's reagent prevents Edman degradation from occurring, in essence leading to a "diversion" of the Edman degradation. Cleavage from the resin then releases the hybrid molecules incorporating a 2-iminohydantoin ring conjugated onto a peptidic fragment. A 400-member library of the iminohydantoin-peptide hybrids was synthesized using this approach, starting from a chlorotrityl resin-supported tripeptides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial ChemistrySame topicChemical Synthesis and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207