MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The tumor promoter TPA enhances benzo[a]pyrene and benzo[a]pyrene diolepoxide mutagenesis in Big Blue� mouse skin

2000· article· en· W2073923516 on OpenAlexaff
Marian L. Miller, Kersi Vasunia, Glenn Talaska, Anastasia Andringa, Johan de Boer, Kathleen Dixon

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental and Molecular Mutagenesis · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
KeywordsBenzo(a)pyreneMolecular biologyCarcinogenMutagenesisDNAChemistryDNA damageMutantCell growthMutagenCarcinogenesisDNA repairBiochemistryBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Big Blue mouse was used to investigate the role of cell proliferation in mutation fixation in the mouse back skin model of carcinogenesis. Phorbol 12-myristate 13 acetate (TPA) was applied to the dorsum of Big Blue mice to manipulate cell proliferation, and benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) or BaP-diolepoxide (BPDE) was applied to produce premutagenic DNA damage. Mutations in the lacI transgene of skin DNA were measured. BaP and BPDE elevated mutant frequency, DNA adducts, and cell damage over untreated and acetone-treated mice. BPDE-DNA adducts peaked within 30 min of exposure and DNA adducts, formed after application of both BaP and BPDE, declined rapidly with time. As the dose of BaP increased (4 to 64 microg), DNA adducts, mutant frequency, and cell damage increased in a dose-dependent manner. TPA applied after BaP and BPDE further increased mutant frequency, DNA adducts, and cell damage, while variably affecting mitotic index and other measures of cell proliferation. TPA became less effective at increasing mitotic index as the dose of BaP increased, although all measures of cell proliferation, taken together, increased. The most effective production of DNA adducts and mutations occurred when the carcinogen was applied simultaneously with or within 1 hr of TPA. Mutations induced by BPDE were predominantly base substitutions: of these base substitutions, 35% were G:C --> A:T transitions, and 36% were G:C --> T:A and 29% G:C --> C:G transversions. Approximately 88% of all mutations and 100% of base substitutions were at G:C sites; 60% of all mutations and 70% of the base substitution mutations occurred at CpG sites. A:T --> G:C transitions were not found. All of the single-base deletions were at G:C base pairs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental and Molecular MutagenesisSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207