<i>Bmi1</i> Distinguishes Immature Retinal Progenitor/Stem Cells from the Main Progenitor Cell Population and Is Required for Normal Retinal Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The developing mammalian retina is generated by the proliferation and differentiation of multipotent retinal progenitor cells (RPCs) giving rise to neuronal and glial lineages. Whether an immature progenitor/stem cell subpopulation is present in the developing mammalian retina remains undefined. Deficiency in the polycomb group gene Bmi1 results in reduced proliferation and postnatal depletion of neural and hematopoietic stem cells. Here, we show that Bmi1 is required for the self-renewal of most immature RPCs and for postnatal retinal development. In the embryo, Bmi1 is highly enriched in a rare stage-specific embryonic antigen-1-positive RPC subpopulation expressing the stem cell markers Sox2, Lhx2, and Musashi. Gain-of-function experiments revealed that Bmi1 overexpression could convert RPCs having limited proliferation capacity into RPCs showing extensive proliferation and multiple differentiation capacities over time. At all developmental stages analyzed using the neurosphere assay, Bmi1 deficiency resulted in reduced proliferation and self-renewal of most immature RPCs. Reduced RPCs proliferation was also observed in the peripheral retina of Bmi1(-/-) fetus and newborn mice. The biological impact of these developmental anomalies was revealed by the reduced retinal diameter of Bmi1-deficient pups. P19(Arf) and p16(Ink4a) were upregulated in vivo and in vitro and coinactivation of p53, which lies downstream of p19(Arf), partially restored Bmi1-deficient RPCs self-renewal phenotype. Bmi1 thus distinguishes immature RPCs from the main RPC population and is required for normal retinal development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".