MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077360795 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-4381

Abstract 4381: The novel direct-acting vascular targeting agent NGR-TNF exerts <i>in vivo</i> antitumor activity by inducing endothelial and tumor cell death in the absence of proangiogenic bone-marrow derived cell recruitment

2012· article· en· W2077360795 on OpenAlexaff
Paola Di Matteo, Christina Hackl, Christopher Jedeszko, Simona Porcellini, Barbara Valentinis, Claudio Bordignon, Catia Traversari, Robert S. Kerbel, Gian‐Paolo Rizzardi

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancer researchLewis lung carcinomaAngiogenesisBone marrowTumor necrosis factor alphaMedicineHoming (biology)OsteopontinCytokineTumor microenvironmentImmunologyBiologyCancerImmune systemMetastasisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Treatment with either certain chemotherapy drugs at maximum tolerated dose (e.g. paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, 5-FU), vascular-disrupting agents (VDAs; e.g. fosbretabulin, Oxi4503), or local irradiation can rapidly induce mobilization and subsequent tumor homing of proangiogenic bone marrow derived cells (BMDCs), such as circulating endothelial progenitor cells (CEPs), CD11b/Tie-2-expressing monocytes (TEMs), CD11b+Gr1+ neutrophils and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Increase in several growth factors and chemokines, such as SDF-1, G-CSF as well as osteopontin, contribute to the mobilization of these BMDCs that can colonize the drug treated tumors preferentially at the viable tumor rim that characteristically remains after treatment with drugs such as VDAs. This process promotes angiogenesis and rapid tumor regrowth, thus diminishing the overall antitumor activities of the aforementioned treatments. NGR-TNF, presently in advanced clinical development, is a direct-acting vascular targeting agent coupling the CNGRCG peptide (NGR), homing to angiogenic blood vessels, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF). Experiments performed in the Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) model, suggested that when administrated at low doses, NGR-TNF causes a decrease of tumor blood vessels density and induces apoptosis of tumor cells without inducing cytokine-rebound and recruitment of pro-angiogenic BMDC. In order to extend these results, we investigated whether NGR-TNF fails to mobilize proangiogenic BMDC even after repeated treatments and in a highly aggressive and metastatic tumor model. LLC and 4T1 mammary gland carcinoma cells were subcutaneously implanted respectively into immunocompetent C57BL/6J or Balb/C mice. Blood was obtained by cardiac puncture or retro-orbital sinus bleeding, 4, 24 hours or 1 week after single or repeated treatments with either NGR-TNF at low and high dose or saline. Using flow cytometry CEPs were defined as CD45−/CD13+/flk-1+/CD117+/7AAD−, TEMs as CD45+/CD11b+/Tie2+ and MDSCs as CD45+/CD11b+/Gr1+ cells. At low doses, NGR-TNF exerts a control of 4T1 primary tumor growth, without inducing cytokine rebound and pro-angiogenic BMDCs mobilization. In addition, even after repeated administrations at low doses, NGR-TNF fails to mobilize or recruit to the tumor site different subtypes of BMDCs. Therefore, low doses of NGR-TNF exert an antitumor activity without inducing a reactive pro-angiogenic host response, and as such provide an explanation and the rationale for the successful use of lower dose NGR-TNF administration protocols in the clinic. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4381. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-4381

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicPeptidase Inhibition and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207