Reactivity of the Chiral Metallic Brønsted Acid [(η<sup>6</sup>-<i>p</i>-MeC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub><i>i</i>Pr)Ru(κ<sup>3</sup><i>P</i>,<i>O,O</i>′-<b>POH</b>)][SbF<sub>6</sub>]<sub>2</sub>(<b>POH</b>= (<i>S</i><sub>C1</sub>,<i>R</i><sub>C2</sub>)-Ph<sub>2</sub>PC(Ph)HC(OH)HCH<sub>2</sub>OMe) toward Aldimines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dichloromethane solutions of complex 1 catalyze both the aza-Diels–Alder (ADA) reaction of aldimines with cyclopentadiene and the aza-Friedel–Crafts (AFC) reaction between aldimines and indoles. Racemic adducts were obtained in both cases. NMR measurements of mixtures of the aldimine N -(4-methylbenzylidene)aniline ( I ) and 1, in a 20/1 molar ratio, reveal the formation of the deprotonated compound 2 and the corresponding iminium cation HI + (H–N + ). This cation is responsible for the achiral catalysis. Below 273 K, in 1/1 molar ratio mixtures of 1 and I, the chiral species 1·I (O–H···N) and 2·HI + (O – ···H–N + ) were formed by intermolecular hydrogen bonding and proton transfer, respectively. The latter solutions catalyze stoichiometrically the ADA reaction between aldimine I and HCp with 16% ee. With 5 mol % of catalyst loading, a 6% ee can be obtained if the aldimine is slowly added to the solution (20 equiv in 60 h). Above 273 K, solutions containing 1 and aldimine I irreversibly evolve to the aniline complex 3, which was isolated as a racemic mixture. The molecular structure of 3 has been determined by X-ray diffractometric methods. Hydride 5, an intermediate in this reaction, has been isolated and spectroscopically characterized. On the basis of synthetic and spectroscopic studies, a plausible pathway for the formation of 3 from 1 is proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".