Shock-wave solutions in two-layer channel flow. I. One-dimensional flows
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study the dynamics of an interface separating two immiscible layers in an inclined channel. Lubrication theory is used to derive an evolution equation for the interface position that models the two-dimensional flow in both co- and countercurrent configurations. This equation is parameterized by viscosity and density ratios, and a total dimensionless flow rate; the system is further characterized by the height of the interface at the channel inlet and outlet, which are treated as additional parameters. In the present work, which corresponds to part I of a two-part paper, we focus on one-dimensional flows. We use an entropy-flux analysis to delineate the existence of various types of shocklike solutions, which include compressive Lax shocks, pairs of Lax and under-compressive shocks, and rarefaction waves. Flows characterized by unstably stratified layers are accompanied by the formation of propagating, large-amplitude interfacial waves, which are not shocklike in nature. The results of our transient numerical simulations accord with our analytical predictions and elucidate the mechanisms underlying spatio-temporal development of the various types of waves; the stability of these waves to spanwise perturbations is investigated in part II of this work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it