Atmospheric Chemistry of 4:2 Fluorotelomer Acrylate [C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>9</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>OC(O)CH═CH<sub>2</sub>]: Kinetics, Mechanisms, and Products of Chlorine-Atom- and OH-Radical-Initiated Oxidation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Relative rate techniques were used to measure the rate constants k[Cl + C(4)F(9)CH(2)CH(2)OC(O)CH=CH(2)] = (2.21 +/- 0.16) x 10(-10) and k[OH + C(4)F(9)CH(2)CH(2)OC(O)CH=CH(2)] = (1.13 +/- 0.12) x 10(-11) cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1) in 700 Torr of N(2) or air diluent at 296 K. The atmospheric lifetime of C(4)F(9)CH(2)CH(2)OC(O)CHCH(2) (4:2 FTAc) is determined by its reaction with OH radicals and is approximately 1 day. The chlorine-atom-initiated oxidation of 4:2 FTAc in 700 Torr of air at 296 K gives C(4)F(9)CH(2)C(O)H in molar yields of 18% and 10% in the absence and presence of NO, respectively. The OH-radical-initiated oxidation of 4:2 FTAc in 700 Torr of air in the presence of NO gives HCHO in a molar yield of (102 +/- 7)%, with C(4)F(9)CH(2)CH(2)OC(O)C(O)H (4:2 fluorotelomer glyoxylate) as the expected coproduct. The atmospheric fate of the 4:2 fluorotelomer glyoxylate will be photolysis and reaction with OH radicals, which will lead to the formation of C(4)F(9)CH(2)C(O)H and ultimately perfluorinated carboxylic acids. The atmospheric oxidation of fluorotelomer acrylates is a potential source of perfluorinated carboxylic acids in remote locations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".