MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078572943 · doi:10.1116/1.2402153

Low-stress silicon carbonitride for the machining of high-frequency nanomechanical resonators

2006· article· en· W2078572943 on OpenAlexafffund
L. M. Fischer, N. Wilding, Murat Gel, Stéphane Evoy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing Measurement and Phenomena · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMechanical and Optical Resonators
Canadian institutionsNational Institute for NanotechnologyUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsMaterials scienceResonatorSiliconX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyUltimate tensile strengthComposite materialResidual stressChemical vapor depositionAnnealing (glass)Young's modulusAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OptoelectronicsNuclear magnetic resonanceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The synthesis of silicon carbonitride by low-temperature plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition and the machining of nanomechanical resonators in this material are reported. Films with thickness of 1μm, 200nm, and 50nm were deposited using ammonia, nitrogen, and diethylsilane as precursors. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy indicated that usage of higher NH3:DES gas flow ratios results in higher nitrogen and low carbon contents in the deposited films. In addition, annealing of the material enabled the full tunability of its residual stress from the compressive to the tensile range. Infrared spectroscopy indicated that desorption of incorporated hydrogen was responsible for those changes. Assaying of resonant cantilevers fabricated from 200-nm-thick films yielded root-modulus-over-density values as high as √(E∕ρ)=8.35×103m∕s, comparable to those of silicon. Doubly clamped beams were also fabricated from 50-nm-thick films of low (σ=80MPa) and high (σ=220MPa) tensile stresses. Beam resonators fabricated in the lower stress material showed resonance qualities ranging between 3000 and 5000, and resonant frequencies between f=6.1MHz and f=16MHz. Beam resonators machined in the higher stress material experienced quality factors between 8000 and 23 000 and frequencies between f=7.6 and 24MHz. These values correspond to fQ products as high as of 1.5×1011s−1, exceeding the performance of previously reported silicon resonators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score0.587

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing Measurement and PhenomenaSame topicMechanical and Optical ResonatorsFrench-language works237,207