Mode of Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157:H7 inactivation by a stabilized oxychloro-based sanitizer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To determine the mechanisms by which a stabilized oxychloro (SOC)-based sanitizer, applied to decontaminate seeds destined for sprout production, inactivates Escherichia coli O157:H7 ph1 and Salmonella serotype Meleagridis. MATERIALS AND RESULTS: The action of SOC on the metabolism, membrane and DNA integrity of Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 was studied. In both pathogens, there was an oxidative burst and depletion of intracellular glutathione (GSH) upon initial exposure to 200 ppm SOC. Metabolic activity, measured via bioluminescence, decreased over a 4-h period in E. coli O157:H7 ph1 cells exposed to SOC. Membrane integrity, assessed through viability staining, decreased progressively over 23 h when exposed to SOC. The appearance of auxotrophic mutants suggested that DNA damage had also occurred. Enzymes rich in disulfide bonds (alkaline phosphatase and protease) were sensitive to the chlorite-based sanitizer. Through challenging other microbial types, it was found that Gram positive had higher tolerance to SOC than Gram negatives with the exception of Salmonella. MS2 bacteriophage was highly sensitive; however, Bacillus endospores were not inactivated by SOC. CONCLUSIONS: SOC inactivates E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella through GSH oxidation and disruption of disulfide bonds. Ultimately, membrane damage resulting from prolonged exposure to SOC leads to the loss of cell viability. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The results provide a basis for understanding why extended treatment times are required to inactivate bacteria using SOC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".