Frustrated Lewis Pair Behavior of Intermolecular Amine/B(C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>5</sub>)<sub>3</sub> Pairs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reactions of N, N -dimethylaniline, N- isopropylaniline, 1,4-C 6 H 4 (CH 2 NH t Bu) 2, and benzyldimethylamine with the Lewis acid B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 have been studied. In the case of N, N -dimethylaniline the combination of the Lewis acid and base forms an almost completely noninteracting frustrated Lewis pair, while the corresponding reactions of N- isopropylaniline and benzyldimethylamine with B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 afford the adducts (PhNH i Pr)B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ( 1 ) and PhCH 2 NMe 2 B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ( 2 ), respectively. 1,4-C 6 H 4 (CH 2 NH t Bu) 2 reacts with 2 equiv of B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 to give rise to an inseparable mixture of the mono- and bis-amine–borane adducts as well as an iminium salt derived from hydride abstraction from a benzylic carbon of the diamine. Subsequent selected reactions of the Lewis acid/base combinations with H 2 afforded [PhNMe 2 H][HB(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ] ( 3 ), [PhCH 2 NMe 2 H][HB(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ] ( 4 ), and [1,4-C 6 H 4 (CH 2 NH 2 t Bu) 2 ][HB(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ] 2 ( 5 ). Reactions with CO 2 gave PhCH 2 NMe 2 CO 2 B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ( 6 ), [PhN i PrH 2 ][PhN i PrCO 2 B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ] ( 8 ), [1,4-C 6 H 4 (CH 2 NH 2 t Bu)(CH 2 N t BuCO 2 B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ] ( 9 ), and [C 5 H 6 Me 4 NMeH] 2 [1,4-C 6 H 4 (CH 2 N t BuCO 2 B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ) 2 ] ( 10 ). Interestingly, the species 4 also reacts with CO 2 to give [PhCH 2 NMe 2 H][HCO 2 B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ] ( 7 ). Species 8 reacts with HSiEt 3 to yield [PhN i PrC(OSiEt 3 )OB(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ] ( 11 ). The adduct 2 also reacts with ethene, 2,4-hexadiyne, and the alkynes HC≡CR (R = n -Bu, Ph, t Bu, SiMe 3 ) to give the 1,2- addition products PhCH 2 NMe 2 CH 2 CH 2 B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ( 12 ), PhCH 2 NMe 2 C(CCMe)=CMeB(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ( 13 ), and the ammonium alkynylborate salts [PhCH 2 NMe 2 H][RCCB(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ] (R = n -Bu ( 14a ), Ph ( 14b ), t Bu ( 14c ), SiMe 3 ( 14d )). In contrast, the reaction of 1-hexyne with the Lewis pair PhNMe 2 and B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 affords the trans-1,2-addition product PhNMe 2 C(C 4 H 9 )=CH(B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ) ( 15 ). This chemistry demonstrates the generality of such FLP chemistry, extending it to N-based Lewis bases and thereby expanding the scope for applications of FLP chemistry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".