Isolation of large terminal sequences of BAC inserts based on double-restriction-enzyme digestion followed by anchored PCR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Isolation of the terminal portions of genomic DNA cloned in bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) is an important step in map-based cloning, and several methods have been developed. Here, we present a new method based on double-restriction-enzyme digestion followed by anchored PCR. BAC DNA was digested with two enzymes: NotI and one of four enzymes (EcoRV, HpaI, StuI, or XmnI) that produce blunt termini. After dephosphorylation, these digestions were ligated to NotI- and EcoRV-digested pMSK, a new cloning vector developed in this work that is derived from pBluescript SK(+). PCR products representing the left- and right-terminal sequences of BAC inserts were obtained using a primer complementary to pMSK and a primer complementary to sequences in either the left arm or the right arm of the BAC vector pBeloBAC11. We have tested this method with 15 different BAC clones, and PCR products representing both the left- and right-terminal sequences have been obtained from all 15 BAC clones. This method is simple, fast, reproducible, and uses the same set of primers for any restriction enzyme used. With some modifications, it can also be used for isolating the terminal portions of genomic DNA cloned in yeast artificial chromosomes and P1-derived artificial chromosomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".