Reactions of phosphines with electron deficient boranes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of classical B(C(6)F(5))(3)-phosphine adducts are shown to be reactive molecules. Reaction of (THF)B(C(6)F(5))(3) with phosphines are shown to effect ring-opening of THF affording the zwitterionic phosphonium-borate species of the form R(2)PH(C(4)H(8)O)B(C(6)F(5))(3) and R(3)P(C(4)H(8)O)B(C(6)F(5))(3). Alternatively, treatment of (THF)B(C(6)F(5))(3) with a lithium phosphide (R(2)PLi, R = tBu, Ph Mes) affords species of the form [Li(THF)(x)][R(2)P(C(4)H(8)O)B(C(6)F(5))(3)]. Additionally, double THF ring-opening is also demonstrated to give species of the form [Li(THF)(x)][R(2)P(C(4)H(8)OB(C(6)F(5))(3))(2)]. In addition a series of classical borane-phosphine adducts are also shown to undergo thermal rearrangement reactions to give the zwitterionic products of aromatic substitution R(2)PH(C(6)F(4))BF(C(6)F(5))(2) and R(3)P(C(6)F(4))BF(C(6)F(5))(2). The mechanism of these substitutions is considered. A series of crystallographic studies of phosphine-borane adducts, THF ring-opened zwitterions and para-attack zwitterionic phosphonium borates are reported and discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".