Chronomics of Pressure Overload–Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy in Mice Reveals Altered Day/Night Gene Expression and Biomarkers of Heart Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is critical demand in contemporary medicine for gene expression markers in all areas of human disease, for early detection of disease, classification, prognosis, and response to therapy. The integrity of circadian gene expression underlies cardiovascular health and disease; however time-of-day profiling in heart disease has never been examined. We hypothesized that a time-of-day chronomic approach using samples collected across 24-h cycles and analyzed by microarrays and bioinformatics advances contemporary approaches, because it includes sleep-time and/or wake-time molecular responses. As proof of concept, we demonstrate the value of this approach in cardiovascular disease using a murine Transverse Aortic Constriction (TAC) model of pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy in mice. First, microarrays and a novel algorithm termed DeltaGene were used to identify time-of-day differences in gene expression in cardiac hypertrophy 8 wks post-TAC. The top 300 candidates were further analyzed using knowledge-based platforms, paring the list to 20 candidates, which were then validated by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR). Next, we tested whether the time-of-day gene expression profiles could be indicative of disease progression by comparing the 1- vs. 8-wk TAC. Lastly, since protein expression is functionally relevant, we monitored time-of-day cycling for the analogous cardiac proteins. This approach is generally applicable and can lead to new understanding of disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".