MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080430705 · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.targ-11-b24

Abstract B24: Detection of O6- and N7-methylguanine adducts by LC/MS in brain tumor tissues obtained from patients treated with temozolomide.

2011· article· en· W2080430705 on OpenAlexaff
Emad Seyed Sadr, Dragosh Catana, Alain Tessier, Mohamad Seyed Sadr, Jad Alshami, C. Sabau, Rolando F. Del Maestro

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicChemical Reactions and Isotopes
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityUniversité de MontréalMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemozolomideO-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferaseCancerMedicineGuanineCancer researchRegimenAdductRadiation therapyMethylationDNAGlioblastomaOncologyChemistryInternal medicineMethyltransferaseBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The current standard of care for glioblastoma includes surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapeutic agents such as temozolomide (TMZ), a DNA methylating compound. The cytotoxic effects of TMZ have been linked to guanine methylation at the N7 and O6 positions. These adducts are not currently used as markers of TMZ efficacy. Using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS), we have established a sensitive analytical assay to directly detect both N7- and O6-methylguanine adducts from DNA following TMZ treatment. A limit of detection below 1 fmol was observed for O6-methylguanine, while N7-methylguanine was observed below 5 fmol. O6- and N7-methylguanine were successfully detected by LC/MS in tumour and normal brain tissue samples from patients treated with a neoadjuvant TMZ regimen for 14 days (75 mg/m2). Variations in levels of both methylated guanines were detected between patients as well as within different locations of the same tumour sample. This technique provides a direct detection of the damage inflicted by TMZ. This could potentially indicate the efficacy of the drug, allowing for prompt analysis and response. It also holds potential for determining efficacy of treatment dose, schedule and possible concomitant drugs. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2011 Nov 12-16; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2011;10(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B24.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.765

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicChemical Reactions and IsotopesFrench-language works237,207