Phosphines Bearing Alkyne Substituents: Synthesis and Hydrophosphination Polymerization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A synthetic route is described for a series of phosphines bearing pendant alkyne substituents, from the conversion of BrC(6)H(2)R(2)C[triple bond]CR' (R = Me, i-Pr; R' = Ph, SiMe(3)) to [(mu-Br)Cu(Et(2)N)(2)PC(6)H(2)R(2)C[triple bond]CR'](2) and subsequently to Cl(2)PC(6)H(2)R(2)C[triple bond]CR' and H(2)PC(6)H(2)R(2)C[triple bond]CR'. Lithiation and subsequent alkylation yield the secondary phosphines R(H)PC(6)H(2)(i-Pr)(2)C[triple bond]CPh (R = CH(2)i-Pr, CH(2)Ph). Intermolecular hydrophosphination-polymerization is used to prepare the polymeric species [RPC(6)H(2)(i-Pr)(2)CH=CPh](n), which can then be sulfurized to give [RP(S)C(6)H(2)(i-Pr)(2)CH=CPh](n). The polymeric products were characterized by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and gel permeation chromatography. These data indicate a degree of polymerization (DP(n)) of up to 60. Discussion of the mechanism is augmented with gas-phase density functional theory calculations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".