Peripheral blood CD27<sup>+</sup> IgG<sup>+</sup> B cells rapidly proliferate and differentiate into immunoglobulin‐secreting cells after exposure to low CD154 interaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In vitro CD40 stimulation of human B cells isolated from lymphoid organs is dominated by memory B cells undergoing faster proliferation and higher differentiation than naive B cells. In contrast, we previously reported that blood memory B cells mainly differentiate into immunoglobulin-secreting cells in response to CD40 stimulation. However, variations in CD40-CD154 interaction are now recognized to influence B-cell fate. In this study, we have compared the in vitro response of blood CD27(-) and CD27(-) IgG(-) to CD27(+) and CD27(+) IgG(+) B cells following low-density exposure to CD154 in the presence of a mixture of interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-4 and IL-10. The evolution of these cell populations was monitored during initiation and following long-term stimulation. Over a 5-day period, CD27(+) B cells underwent differentiation into immunoglobulin-secreting cells more readily than CD27(-) cells, and CD27(+) IgG(+) B cells gave rise to a near homogeneous population of CD19(+) CD27(++) CD38(+) IgG(lo) cells capable of high immunoglobulin G (IgG) secretion. During the same period, CD27(-) IgG(-) B cells partially became CD19(++) CD27(-) CD38(-) IgG(++) cells but showed no IgG secretion. Long-term stimulation revealed that CD27(+) IgG(+) B cells retained a high expansion capacity and could maintain their momentum towards differentiation over naive B cells. In addition, long-term stimulation was driving CD27(-) IgG(-) and total CD19(+) B cells to evolve into similar CD27(+) and CD27(-) subsets, suggesting naive homeostatic proliferation. Overall, these results tend to reconcile memory B cells from blood and lymphoid organs regarding their preferential differentiation capacity compared to naive cells, and further suggest that circulating memory IgG(+) cells may be intrinsically prone to rapid activation upon appropriate stimulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".