Inter‐ and intraspecific relationships between shade tolerance and shade avoidance in temperate trees
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Patterns of physiological and architectural adaptation and acclimation to decreasing light availability were investigated along a light gradient for saplings of 12 common species of temperate deciduous trees in southeastern Ontario, Canada. Physiological adaptation and acclimation (shade tolerance physiology) were quantified at the leaf level by measuring leaf mass per unit area (LMA), dark respiration per unit leaf nitrogen, chlorophyll per unit leaf nitrogen and the chlorophyll a:b ratio for the newest fully expanded leaf on the leader. Architectural adaptation and acclimation (shade avoidance) were quantified by measuring branching intensity and side shoot:main shoot length ratios for the most recent three years of growth on the leader and selected side branches. Within species, increases in LMA, chlorophyll a:b ratio and respiration per unit nitrogen and decreases in chlorophyll per unit nitrogen indicated that shade tolerance physiology generally increased with decreasing canopy openness. Increases in the branching intensity and side shoot:main shoot ratios of the leader and side branches indicated that shade avoidance also increased with decreasing canopy openness for the majority of species; however, in some species, stem bending under deep shade resulted in lateral growth. Interspecific variation in shade tolerance physiology was minimal when species were compared under equal amounts of canopy openness. In contrast, interspecific variation in shade avoidance variables was relatively high under equal canopy openness, with saplings of shade tolerant canopy species exhibiting higher shade avoidance than saplings of shade tolerant understory species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".