Disease-Causing SAP Mutants Are Defective in Ligand Binding and Protein Folding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The X-linked lymphoproliferative (XLP) syndrome is caused by mutations or deletions in the SH2D1A gene that encodes an SH2 domain protein named SH2D1A or SAP. The identification of a number of missense mutations within the protein's SH2 domain, each of which can directly cause disease, provides a unique opportunity to investigate the function of an interaction protein module, SH2, in the pathogenesis of XLP. We show here that SAP mutants found in XLP patients are defective in binding its physiological ligands signaling lymphocyte activating molecule (SLAM), a co-receptor in T cell activation, and Fyn, a Src family protein tyrosine kinase. Consequently, these mutants are deficient in signaling through the SLAM receptor. This is reflected by compromised abilities for the mutants to recruit Fyn to SLAM and to activate Fyn, by reduced phosphorylation of the receptor, and by deficiencies for the mutants in blocking binding of SHP-2 to SLAM. Furthermore, all mutants examined are defective in protein folding as manifested by their significantly reduced melting temperatures upon thermal denaturation, compared to that of SAP. Taken together, these results suggest that defects in ligand binding, receptor signaling, and protein folding collectively contribute to the loss of function for disease-causing SAP mutants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".