Role of Helix P of the Human Cytomegalovirus DNA Polymerase in Resistance and Hypersusceptibility to the Antiviral Drug Foscarnet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mutations in the human cytomegalovirus DNA polymerase (UL54) can not only decrease but also increase susceptibility to the pyrophosphate (PP(i)) analogue foscarnet. The proximity of L802M, which confers resistance, and K805Q, which confers hypersusceptibility, suggests a possible unifying mechanism that affects drug susceptibility in one direction or the other. We found that the polymerase activities of L802M- and K805Q-containing mutant enzymes were literally indistinguishable from that of wild-type UL54; however, susceptibility to foscarnet was decreased or increased, respectively. A comparison with the crystal structure model of the related RB69 polymerase suggests that L802 and K805 are located in the conserved alpha-helix P that is implicated in nucleotide binding. Although L802 and K805 do not appear to make direct contacts with the incoming nucleotide, it is conceivable that changes at these residues could exert their effects through the adjacent, highly conserved amino acids Q807 and/or K811. Our data show that a K811A substitution in UL54 causes reductions in rates of nucleotide incorporation. The activity of the Q807A mutant is only marginally affected, while this enzyme shows relatively high levels of resistance to foscarnet. Based on these data, we suggest that L802M exerts its effects through subtle structural changes in alpha-helix P that affect the precise positioning of Q807 and, in turn, its presumptive involvement in binding of foscarnet. In contrast, the removal of a positive charge associated with the K805Q change may facilitate access or increase affinity to the adjacent Q807.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".