MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Safety and efficacy of affinity-purified, anti–tumor necrosis factor-α, ovine fab for injection (CytoFab) in severe sepsis*

2006· letter· en· W2090023887 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Todd W. Rice, Arthur P. Wheeler, Peter E. Morris, Harold L. Paz, James A. Russell, Tonya R. Edens, Gordon R. Bernard

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2006
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsMedicinePlaceboSeptic shockSepsisBronchoalveolar lavageTumor necrosis factor alphaInternal medicineGastroenterologyAdverse effectClinical endpointShock (circulatory)Intensive careRandomized controlled trialSurgeryImmunologyPathologyIntensive care medicineLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is a critical inflammatory mediator in sepsis. This trial was designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of polyclonal ovine anti-TNF fragment antigen binding (Fab) fragments (CytoFab) on plasma TNF-alpha, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-8 (IL-8) concentrations and the number of shock-free and ventilator-free days in severely septic patients. DESIGN: Phase II, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial conducted from September 1997 to July 1998. SETTING: Nineteen intensive care units in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: Eighty-one septic patients with either shock or two organ dysfunctions. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive CytoFab, infused as a 250-units/kg loading dose, followed by nine doses of 50 units/kg every 12 hrs, or 5 mg/kg human albumin as placebo. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: CytoFab promptly reduced plasma TNF-alpha (p = .001) and IL-6 concentrations (p = .002) compared with placebo. CytoFab also significantly decreased TNF-alpha in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid (p < .001). The number of shock-free days did not differ between CytoFab and placebo (10.7 vs. 9.4, respectively) (p = .270). CytoFab increased mean ventilator-free days (15.0 vs. 9.8 for placebo; p = .040) and ICU-free days (12.6 vs. 7.6 for placebo; p = .030) at day 28. All-cause, 28-day mortality rates were 37% (14/38) for placebo recipients, compared with 26% (11/43) for CytoFab recipients (p = .274). No differences in incidences of adverse events, laboratory, or vital sign abnormalities were observed between groups. Although 41% of CytoFab-treated patients developed detectable plasma levels of human anti-sheep antibodies, none demonstrated clinical manifestations during the 28-day study. CONCLUSIONS: CytoFab is well tolerated in patients with severe sepsis, effectively reducing serum and BAL TNF-alpha and serum IL-6 concentrations and increasing the number of ventilator-free and ICU-free days at day 28.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care MedicineSame topicSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207