Random mutagenesis suggests that sequence errors are not a major cause of variation in the activity of individual molecules of β-galactosidase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wild-type Escherichia coli lacZ was subjected to error-prone PCR to generate two plasmid-encoded gene libraries containing approximately 2.6 (SD 1.9) nucleotide exchanges resulting in 1.8 (SD 1.4) amino-acid substitutions. The libraries were used, along with a plasmid containing wild-type lacZ, to transform E. coli lacking genomic lacZ. Cells expressing functional β-galactosidase were identified by blue/white screening. Cell lysates containing the populations of heterogeneously mutagenized β-galactosidase were subjected to single molecule assays using a capillary electrophoresis laser-induced fluorescence-based protocol. There was no significant difference in the average catalytic rate between the random mutagenized and wild-type enzyme populations. Furthermore, there was no clear pattern between error rates and the variances in the population catalytic rates. This suggests that random sequence errors are not a substantial source of the catalytic heterogeneity of this enzyme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".