MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090767709 · doi:10.1081/dmr-100000140

MECHANISMS OF 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE-INDUCED CYTOTOXICITY IN LUNG AND LIVER<sup>*,†</sup>

2001· review· en· W2090767709 on OpenAlexaff
Poh‐Gek Forkert

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug Metabolism Reviews · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsGlutathioneChemistryBiochemistryMicrosomeEpoxideCytotoxicityLungIn vivoHepatocyteIn vitroBiologyInternal medicineEnzymeMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exposure to 1,1-dichloroethylene (DCE) causes lung and liver toxicities in mice. The lesions are characterized by damage preferentially to bronchiolar Clara cells in the lung and necrosis of centrilobular hepatocytes in the liver. The primary metabolites formed from DCE in lung and liver microsomal incubations are the epoxide, 2,2-dichloroacetaldehyde and 2-chloroacetyl chloride, which undergo hydrolysis and/or conjugation with glutathione (GSH). The major products formed are the epoxide-derived GSH conjugates 2-(S-glutathionyl) acetyl glutathione [B] and 2-S-glutathionyl acetate [C]. The hydrate of 2,2-dichloroacetaldehyde (acetal) is also detected. These metabolites are detected in vivo in murine lung and liver cytosol and in bile, and importantly, also in human lung and liver microsomal incubations. Formation of the epoxide is mediated mainly by CYP2E1. Immunohistochemical studies localized the epoxide-derived GSH conjugate [C] and cysteine-containing proteins in Clara cells and centrilobular hepatocytes. These findings are consistent with the premise that the lung and liver cytotoxicities induced by DCE are associated with in situ formation of the epoxide within the target cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDrug Metabolism ReviewsSame topicPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismFrench-language works237,207