MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091260658 · doi:10.1021/mp400024d

Polyamine Transport by the Polyspecific Organic Cation Transporters OCT1, OCT2, and OCT3

2013· article· en· W2091260658 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Pharmaceutics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPolyamine Metabolism and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institute on Minority Health and Health DisparitiesNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsOrganic cation transport proteinsSpermidineChemistryPolyamineSpermineTransporterPutrescineBiochemistrySolute carrier familyMediated transportBiophysicsEnzymeBiologyMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polyamines are ubiquitous organic cations implicated in many physiological processes. Because they are positively charged at physiological pH, carrier-mediated systems are necessary for effective membrane permeation, but the identity of specific polyamine transporter proteins in eukaryotic cells remains unclear. Polyspecific organic cation transporters (OCTs) interact with many natural and xenobiotic monovalent cations and have been reported to transport dicationic compounds, including the short polyamine putrescine. In this study, we used Xenopus oocytes expressing mammalian OCT1 (SLC22A1), OCT2 (SLC22A2), or OCT3 (SLC22A3) to assess binding and transport of longer-chain polyvalent polyamines. In OCT-expressing oocytes, [(3)H]MPP(+) uptake rates were 15- to 35-fold higher than in noninjected oocytes, whereas those for [(3)H]spermidine increased more modestly above the background, up to 3-fold. This reflected up to 20-fold lower affinity for spermidine than for MPP(+); thus, K(0.5) for MPP(+) was ~50 μM in OCT1, ~170 μM in OCT2, and ~60 μM in OCT3, whereas for spermidine, K(0.5) was ~1 mM in OCT1, OCT2, and OCT3. J(max) values for MPP(+) and spermidine were within the same range, suggesting that both compounds are transported at a similar turnover rate. To gain further insight into OCT substrate specificity, we screened a selection of structural polyamine analogues for effect on [(3)H]MPP(+) uptake. In general, blocking potency increased with overall hydrophobic character, which indicates that, as for monovalent cations, hydrophobicity is a major requirement for recognition in polyvalent OCT substrates and inhibitors. Our results demonstrate that the natural polyamines are low affinity, but relatively high turnover, substrates for OCTs. The identification of OCTs as polyamine transport systems may contribute to further understanding of the mechanisms involved in polyamine homeostasis and aid in the design of polyamine-like OCT-targeted drugs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.752

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it