MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091326791 · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2011-301993.20

1142 Mexiletine is an effective treatment in non-dystrophic myotonia

2012· article· en· W2091326791 on OpenAlexaff
Dipa Raja Rayan, Richard J. Barohn, Brian N. Bundy, Y Wang, Laura Herbelin, Jaya Trivedi, Shannon L. Venance, G. Meola, Robert C. Griggs, Michael G. Hanna

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMexiletineMedicineMyotoniaPlaceboCrossover studyWeaknessAnesthesiaMuscle stiffnessMyotonia congenitaInternal medicinePhysical therapyCardiologyMyotonic dystrophySurgeryStiffness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Non-Dystrophic Myotonias (NDM) are a group of skeletal muscle channelopathies caused by mutations in the chloride channel gene, CLCN1 or sodium channel gene, SCN4A. They can cause disabling stiffness, fatigue and weakness. There is anecdotal evidence that mexiletine may reduce stiffness but no randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have been done to date. We conducted an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of 59 subjects with NDM. Participants were randomised to mexiletine 200 mg tds or placebo for 4 weeks, followed by a 1-week wash out, and then crossover to the alternate treatment for 4 weeks. Efficacy of the drug was monitored by daily patient reported symptom severity (stiffness, pain, weakness, tiredness) on a scale of 1–9. Improvement in stiffness was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included a clinical assessment, quality of life, quantitative grip myotonia assessment and neurophysiological measurements of short and long exercise testing and myotonia on needle EMG. Mexiletine was found to significantly improve stiffness compared with placebo with a mean difference of 2.73 (p<0.0001) compared with placebo. It also significantly improved pain, weakness, fatigue and quality of life. It was well tolerated with no serious cardiac events. Gastrointestinal side effects were reported by 15%. Mexiletine is therefore an effective and safe drug in the treatment of stiffness in NDM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & PsychiatrySame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207