Characterization of a cGMP-Response Element in the Guanylyl Cyclase/Natriuretic Peptide Receptor A Gene Promoter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) can inhibit transcription of its receptor, guanylyl cyclase A, by a mechanism dependent on cGMP and have suggested the presence of a putative cGMP-response element (cGMP-RE) in the Npr1 gene promoter. To localize and characterize the putative cis-acting element, we have subcloned a 1520-bp fragment of the rat Npr1 promoter in an expression vector containing the luciferase reporter gene. Several fragments, generated by exonuclease III-directed deletions, were transiently transfected into cells to measure their promoter activity. Deletion from -1520 to -1396 of a 1520-bp-long Npr1 promoter led to a 5-fold increase in luciferase activity. Subsequent deletion to the position -1307 resulted in a decrease of luciferase activity by 90%. Preincubation of cells with 100 nM of ANP or 100 microM 8-bromo-cGMP inhibited luciferase activity of the 1520-bp and 1396-bp-long fragments, but not the activity of the 1307-bp fragment, suggesting that the cGMP-RE is localized between positions -1396 and -1307. The cGMP regulatory region was narrowed by gel shift assays and footprinting to position -1372 to -1354 from the transcription start site of Npr1 and indicated its interaction with transcriptional factor(s). Cross-competition experiments with mutated oligonucleotides led to the definition of a consensus sequence (-1372 AaAtRKaNTTCaAcAKTY -1354) for the novel cGMP-RE, which is conserved in the human (75% identity) and mouse (95% identity) Npr1 promoters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".