Predicted poxvirus FEN1-like nuclease required for homologous recombination, double-strand break repair and full-size genome formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Poxviruses encode many if not all of the proteins required for viral genome replication in the cytoplasm of the host cell. In this context, we investigated the function of the vaccinia virus G5 protein because it belongs to the FEN1-like family of nucleases and is conserved in all poxviruses. A vaccinia virus G5 deletion mutant was severely impaired, as the yield of infectious virus was reduced by approximately two orders of magnitude. The mutant virions contained an apparently normal complement of proteins but appeared spherical rather than brick-shaped and contained no detectable DNA. The inability of G5 with substitutions of the predicted catalytic aspartates to complement the deletion mutant suggested that G5 functions as a nuclease during viral DNA replication. Although the amount of viral DNA produced in the absence of G5 was similar to that made by wild-type virus, the mean size was approximately one-fourth of the genome length. Experiments with transfected plasmids showed that G5 was required for double-strand break repair by homologous recombination, suggesting a similar role during vaccinia virus genome replication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".