Deazapurine Solid-Phase Synthesis: Combinatorial Synthesis of a Library of N3,N5,C6-Trisubstituted Pyrrolo[3,2-<i>d</i>]pyrimidine Derivatives on Cross-Linked Polystyrene Bearing a Cysteamine Linker
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Solid-phase methodology for the preparation of pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidine-6-carboxylates with diversity at the N3 pyrmidine nitrogen has now been elaborated to allow for the generation of pyrrolopyrimidine libraries with members possessing diversity at the N3, N5, and C6 positions. The diversification of the N5 position was achieved by treating the parent resin-bound pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidines 3 with an alkyl halide in the presence of Cs2CO3 in DMF. Modification of the C6 carboxylate of resin-bound pyrrolopyrimidines 3-5 was first achieved by hydrolysis of the benzyl ester using LiOH in a mixture of THF/H2O/MeOH. Further alteration of the C6 position of resin-bound pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidine-6-carboxylic acids 6-8 was then performed by activation with triphosgene and treatment with an amine to furnish resin-bound pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidine-6-amides. Twenty-two pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidines 1a-v with different substituents at the N3, N5, and C6 positions were obtained in yields of 21-83% and purities of 61-98% after cleavage from the solid support.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".