Mechanically induced calcium signaling in chondrocytes in situ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Changes in intracellular calcium (Ca(2+)) concentration, also known as Ca(2+) signaling, have been widely studied in articular cartilage chondrocytes to investigate pathways of mechanotransduction. Various physical stimuli can generate an influx of Ca(2+) into the cell, which in turn is thought to trigger a range of metabolic and signaling processes. In contrast to most studies, the approach used in this study allows for continuous real time recording of calcium signals in chondrocytes in their native environment. Therefore, interactions of cells with the extracellular matrix (ECM) are fully accounted for. Calcium signaling was quantified for dynamic loading conditions and at different temperatures. Peak magnitudes of calcium signals were greater and of shorter duration at 37°C than at 21°C. Furthermore, Ca(2+) signals were involved in a greater percentage of cells in the dynamic compared to the relaxation phases of loading. In contrast to the time-delayed signaling observed in isolated chondrocytes seeded in agarose gel, Ca(2+) signaling in situ is virtually instantaneous in response to dynamic loading. These differences between in situ and in vitro cell signaling responses might provide crucial insight into the role of the ECM in providing pathways of mechanotransduction in the intact cartilage that are absent in isolated cells seeded in gel constructs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".