MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094745518 · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70047-4

Changing the research criteria for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease: obstacles and opportunities

2013· article· en· W2094745518 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniela Berg, Anthony E. Lang, Ronald B. Postuma, Walter Maetzler, Günther Deuschl, Thomas Gasser, Andrew Siderowf, Anthony H.V. Schapira, Wolfgang H. Oertel, José Á. Obeso, C. Warren Olanow, Werner Poewe, Matthew Stern

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Neurology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityToronto Western HospitalMontreal General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersUCB PharmaFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchH. Lundbeck A/SJanssen PharmaceuticalsEberhard Karls Universität TübingenRobert Bosch StiftungGlaxoSmithKlineParkinson Society CanadaEuropean Parkinson’s Disease AssociationUCBEuropean CommissionMeso Scale DiagnosticsHelmholtz AssociationEdwin S. Webster FoundationNovartisBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's ResearchBoehringer IngelheimMedtronic
KeywordsParkinson's diseaseDiseaseMedicineComputer scienceManagement sciencePsychologyData scienceEngineeringPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.407
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.419
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score0.731

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.4070.419
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.004
Bibliometrics0.0090.006
Science and technology studies0.0060.026
Scholarly communication0.0160.029
Open science0.0210.013
Research integrity0.0280.043
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.196
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations154
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet NeurologySame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207