MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095256902 · doi:10.1002/ddr.1151

Synthesis of 1‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐<scp>D</scp>‐ribofuranosyl)‐2,4‐ difluoro‐5‐(2‐halo‐1‐hydroxyethyl)benzenes and related derivatives: “thymine replacement” analogs of deoxythymidine for evaluation as antiviral and anticancer agents

2001· article· en· W2095256902 on OpenAlexaff
Ebrahim Naimi, Leonard I. Wiebe, Jan Balzarini, Erik De Clercq, Edward E. Knaus

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug Development Research · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThymidine kinaseChemistryVaricella zoster virusHerpes simplex virusNucleoside analogueThymidineThymineStereochemistryVirusNucleosideVirologyBiochemistryBiologyIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A group of unnatural 1‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐ D ‐ribofuranosyl)‐2,4‐difluorobenzenes having a variety of C‐5 substituents, designed as thymidine mimics, were synthesized for evaluation as antiviral and anticancer agents. The regiospecific addition of HOBr (generated from N ‐bromosuccinimide in aqueous dioxane) across the 5‐vinyl substituent ( 4 ) afforded the corresponding 5‐[‐CH(OH)CH 2 Br] product ( 5 ), whereas reaction of 4 with iodine in the presence of iodic acid (HOI) yielded the 5‐[CH(OH)CH 2 I] product ( 6 ). The related 5‐[‐CH(OH)CHX 2 (X = Br, I)] analogs ( 11 , 12 ) were similarly prepared from the ( E )‐5‐(2‐halovinyl) precursors ( 9 , 10 ). Treatment of the 5‐[‐CH(OH)CH 2 X (X = Br, I)] compounds ( 5 , 6 ) with NaOH in aqueous dioxane afforded the 5‐oxiranyl product ( 8 ). The 5‐[‐CH(OMe)CH 2 I] compound ( 7 ) was prepared by reaction of the 5‐vinyl compound (4) with ICl in MeOH (MeOI). This group of compounds ( 5 – 8 , 11 , 12 ) showed similar (marginal) activity against varicella‐zoster virus thymidine kinase positive (VZV/TK + ) and thymidine kinase deficient (VZV/TK – ) infected cells. Thus, the viral TK enzyme did not provide a gene therapeutic effect. This group of compounds, which were evaluated using a wide variety of antiviral assay systems [(herpes simplex virus HSV‐1, HSV‐2), varicella‐zoster virus (VZV), vaccinia virus, vesicular stomatitis, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV‐1, HIV‐2)], showed that these unnatural C‐aryl nucleoside mimics are inactive antiviral agents. Their failure to exhibit antiviral/anticancer activity could be due to the fact that they are not phosphorylated to the 5′‐monophosphate, or that incorporation of the active 5′‐triphosphate into DNA does not produce a cytotoxic effect, and/or that these C‐aryl nucleoside mimics do not act as inhibitors of thymidylate synthase, which may be required to produce a cytotoxic effect. Drug Dev. Res. 52:492–499, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDrug Development ResearchSame topicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus researchFrench-language works237,207