MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096998268

Sustainability Issues for Australian Research Data: The report of the Australian eResearch Sustainability Survey Project

2006· article· en· W2096998268 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Markus Buchhorn, Paul E. McNamara

Bibliographic record

VenueANU Open Research (Australian National University) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicResearch Data Management Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesMedical Research CouncilFlinders UniversityArts and Humanities Research CouncilDirectorate for Biological SciencesNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of WarwickNatural Environment Research CouncilUniversity of CanberraNational Archives of AustraliaSwinburne University of TechnologyUniversity of Technology SydneyResearch Councils UKUniversity of New South WalesOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and ForestryNational Library of AustraliaAustralian Academy of ScienceAustralian Academy of the HumanitiesNational Science FoundationUniversity of South AustraliaFisheries Research and Development CorporationNational Health and Medical Research CouncilQueensland University of TechnologyCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
KeywordsSustainabilitySustainability scienceEnvironmental resource managementSustainability organizationsEnvironmental planningBusinessGeographyEnvironmental science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Australian e-Research Sustainability Survey (AERES) project was undertaken by the Australian Partnership for Sustainable Repositories (APSR) and the Australian Partnership for Advanced Computing (APAC) to survey the sustainability issues for data-intensive research projects, including the capabilities and demands of research groups and institutions for the storage, access, and long-term management of research data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.236
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.453
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Open science
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.942

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2360.453
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.027
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0120.009
Open science0.0040.012
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.526
GPT teacher head0.542
Teacher spread0.016 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
DomainReproducibility
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueANU Open Research (Australian National University)Same topicResearch Data Management PracticesFrench-language works237,207