Copy Number Analysis of c-erb-B2 (HER-2/neu) and Topoisomerase IIα Genes in Breast Carcinoma by Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Using Hybridization Probes and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONTEXT: The Topoisomerase IIalpha (TOP2A) protein is the target of the anthracycline class of chemotherapeutic agents. TOP2A is frequently coamplified with c-erb-B2 and consequently might be a prognostic and/or predictive factor for breast cancer patients when anthracycline-based chemotherapy is a consideration. A total of 20% to 35% of breast carcinomas show amplification of the erb-B2 gene, some of which also have coamplification of the TOP2A gene. Investigation of the prognostic or predictive significance of these gene amplifications requires a reliable and sensitive method for the measurement of gene copy number in clinical tumor samples. OBJECTIVE: To assess 2 different assay methods that might allow accurate, reproducible, quantitative, and high-throughput estimation of gene copy number in fresh, frozen, or paraffin-embedded breast cancer specimens. DESIGN: We developed an assay and analyzed the gene copy numbers of the erb-B2 and TOP2A genes in 8 breast cancer cell lines, 6 fresh frozen samples, and 38 paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens by a novel real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay using hybridization probes. The results were compared with standard fluorescence in situ hybridization. RESULTS: We discovered a 100% concordance between assessment of gene copy number of erb-B2 and TOP2A between quantitative PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Quantitative PCR also had the additional feature of uncovering an erb-B2 gene polymorphism. Finally, we observed that TOP2A amplification only occurred in conjunction with erb-B2 amplification in our paraffin-embedded cases of invasive breast carcinoma and that this event was present in 5 (42%) of 12 erb-B2 amplified cases. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the potentially automatic, real-time PCR analysis using hybridization probes is an efficient method to perform copy number analysis, with results that appear identical to the FISH technique and with the benefit of identifying HER-2 polymorphisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".