MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097806259 · doi:10.1139/g08-078

Refinement of the locus for distal hereditary motor neuronopathy VII (dHMN-VII) and exclusion of candidate genes

2008· article· en· W2097806259 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Katherine Dick, Meriel McEntagart, Wisam Alwan, Mary M. Reilly, Andrew H. Crosby

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHereditary Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNewlife the Charity for Disabled Children
KeywordsBiologyGeneticsLocus (genetics)GeneCandidate gene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distal hereditary motor neuronopathy type seven (dHMN-VII) is an autosomal dominant condition characterized by distal muscular atrophy associated with unilateral or bilateral vocal cord paralysis. We previously mapped the dHMN-VII locus to chromosome 2q14 using a genome-wide linkage scan in a single large pedigree. Here we have performed more detailed microsatellite saturation analysis and also evaluated two new affected individuals not described in the original study. We have significantly refined the extent of the disease locus and show that two distinct regions of chromosome 2q14.2, comprising 9.2 Mb and 4.3 Mb separated by an unusual double recombination event, cosegregate with the disease phenotype. The proximal linked region is now defined by markers D2S3038-D2S160, and the distal region by D2S2970-D2S2969. Sequencing of 15 candidate genes within the critical interval has not yet revealed any pathogenic mutations. Inspection of genomic databases indicates that this refinement of the critical interval by 8.4 Mb reduces the number of candidate genes from approximately 400 to approximately 100.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicHereditary Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207