Resistance mechanism development to the topoisomerase-I inhibitor Hoechst 33342 by<i>Leishmania donovani</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The bisbenzimidazole compound Hoechst 33342 (Ho342) has been identified as a specific Topoisomerase-I (Topo-I) inhibitor in mammalian cells. More recently, we have reported the ability of Ho342 to target L. donovani Topo-I, leading to parasite growth inhibition in vitro by mechanisms involving DNA breakage and apoptosis-like phenomenon. As the Ho342 lead molecule (2,5'-Bi-1H-benzimidazole) can be used as a starting structure for derivative compounds more effective against Leishmania, defining the Ho342 resistance mechanism(s) in Leishmania represents an important strategic tool. In the present study, we selected resistant parasites to Ho342 (LdRHo.300). While we observed an increase of the Topo-I gene expression correlated by a higher Topo-I DNA relaxation activity, the Topo-I genes (LdTOP1A and LdTOP1B) sequencing did not reveal any mutation for the resistant parasites. Moreover, our results on Ho342 cellular accumulation suggested the presence of a potential energy-dependent Ho342 transporter in the wild-type parasite, and that an alteration of this transporter has occurred in LdRHo.300, leading to an altered drug accumulation. Collectively, Ho342 resistance characterization provided results supporting that the resistance developed by LdRHo.300 involves complex mechanisms, most likely dominated by an altered drug accumulation, providing new insight in the Ho342 resistance mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".