5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide 1-β-<scp>d</scp>-ribofuranoside (AICAR) stimulates myocardial glycogenolysis by allosteric mechanisms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) promotes myocardial glycogenolysis by decreasing glycogen synthase (GS) and/or increasing glycogen phosphorylase (GP) activities. Isolated working hearts from halothane-anesthetized male Sprague-Dawley rats perfused in the absence or presence of 0.8 or 1.2 mM 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide 1-beta-d-ribofuranoside (AICAR), an adenosine analog and cell-permeable activator of AMPK, were studied. Glycogen degradation was increased by AICAR, while glycogen synthesis was not affected. AICAR increased myocardial 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide 1-beta-d-ribofuranotide (ZMP), the active intracellular form of AICAR, but did not alter the activity of GS and GP measured in tissue homogenates or the content of glucose-6-phosphate and adenine nucleotides in freeze-clamped tissue. Importantly, the calculated intracellular concentration of ZMP achieved in this study was similar to the K(m) value of ZMP for GP determined in homogenates of myocardial tissue. We conclude that the data are consistent with allosteric activation of GP by ZMP being responsible for the glycogenolysis caused by AICAR in the intact rat heart.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".