MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102229286 · doi:10.25011/cim.v32i5.6928

Clinical research in Canada: the dawn of a new era?

2009· article· en· W2102229286 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jean L. Rouleau

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and investigative medicine · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth and Medical Research Impacts
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical researchSustainabilityMedicineHealth careMedical educationPublic relationsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In response to the growing gap between discovery and the optimal application of medical advancements to health care delivery, countries the world over have developed large and well funded programs to reduce these gaps. Although these programs vary in nature, they have generally largely focused more on reducing the gap in bench to bedside research. Canada's strong biomedical and patient oriented research (POR) community has a strong base from which to build, but requires support in order to fill the missing elements needed to take full advantage of the important unmet needs in health related research. In Canada, a coalition of funders of medical research, led by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) is developing a large and comprehensive program to build a Canadian infrastructure that will provide these missing elements, and further strengthen POR in Canada. This coalition proposes to put particular emphasis on bedside to community POR, including phase 3 clinical trials, to take advantage of and improve the sustainability of Canada's unique universal health care system. The major initiatives in POR developed by so many countries, including Canada clearly heralds a new era in clinical research, one that the Canadian research community needs to take full advantage of.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.034
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.045
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.908

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0340.045
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0190.025
Scholarly communication0.0210.009
Open science0.0050.009
Research integrity0.0120.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.785
GPT teacher head0.602
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and investigative medicineSame topicHealth and Medical Research ImpactsFrench-language works237,207