MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102923747 · doi:10.1128/mcb.01620-06

RECQL, a Member of the RecQ Family of DNA Helicases, Suppresses Chromosomal Instability

2006· article· en· W2102923747 on OpenAlexaff
Sudha Sharma, Deborah J. Stumpo, Adayabalam S. Balajee, Cheryl B. Bock, Peter M. Lansdorp, Robert M. Brosh, Perry J. Blackshear

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular and Cellular Biology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyColumbia College
FundersNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Institute on AgingNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsBiologyGenome instabilityRecQ helicaseBloom syndromeGeneticsChromosome instabilityPhenotypeDNA damageDNA repairHelicaseChromothripsisMolecular biologyGeneDNACell biologyChromosome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mouse gene Recql is a member of the RecQ subfamily of DEx-H-containing DNA helicases. Five members of this family have been identified in both humans and mice, and mutations in three of these, BLM, WRN, and RECQL4, are associated with human diseases and a cellular phenotype that includes genomic instability. To date, no human disease has been associated with mutations in RECQL and no cellular phenotype has been associated with its deficiency. To gain insight into the physiological function of RECQL, we disrupted Recql in mice. RECQL-deficient mice did not exhibit any apparent phenotypic differences compared to wild-type mice. Cytogenetic analyses of embryonic fibroblasts from the RECQL-deficient mice revealed aneuploidy, spontaneous chromosomal breakage, and frequent translocation events. In addition, the RECQL-deficient cells were hypersensitive to ionizing radiation, exhibited an increased load of DNA damage, and displayed elevated spontaneous sister chromatid exchanges. These results provide evidence that RECQL has a unique cellular role in the DNA repair processes required for genomic integrity. Genetic background, functional redundancy, and perhaps other factors may protect the unstressed mouse from the types of abnormalities that might be expected from the severe chromosomal aberrations detected at the cellular level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations108
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular and Cellular BiologySame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207