MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103444442 · doi:10.2166/wqrjc.2011.013

Colour removal and the effect of reactive dyes on acid producing anaerobic microorganisms

2011· article· en· W2103444442 on OpenAlexaff
Debraj Bhattacharyya, Kripa S. Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Quality Research Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistrySucroseAcidogenesisAdsorptionAnaerobic exerciseOrange (colour)Food scienceNuclear chemistryEnvironmental chemistryOrganic chemistryAnaerobic digestionBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cultures from a sucrose-fed anaerobic acid reactor were dosed with 0, 60, 100, 200, 400, 800 and 1,500 mg/L, of a mixture of three Procion reactive dyes, Red MX-8B, Red MX-5B and Orange MX-2R, in order to study the colour removal and the toxic effect of the dyes on anaerobic acidification of sucrose. Sucrose undergoes a possible extracellular transformation into intermediate substances before being taken up by the acidogens for volatile fatty acid (VFA) synthesis. The rate and the extent of this uptake is unaffected by the presence of dyes. The dyes, however, reduced the rate of synthesis of VFA, and considerably diminished the VFA production potential of sucrose. The acidification stopped, likely due to an inhibition caused by VFA accumulation. As a result, only 50–60% of the soluble organic carbon was utilised for VFA synthesis. The removal of colour by the unacclimated anaerobic acidogenic biomass takes place by adsorption. However, Freundlich's adsorption constants did not suggest a favourable adsorption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Quality Research JournalSame topicEnzyme Catalysis and ImmobilizationFrench-language works237,207