MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104670235 · doi:10.1139/g00-028

Somatic segregation in rice

2000· article· en· W2104670235 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
J. Sybenga

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologySomatic cellGeneticsEvolutionary biologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

somatic (diplontic) selection would sufficiently rapidly elim inate heterozygous cell lineages after tissue differentiation has started. An alternative explanation is elimination of one of the genomes, followed by chromosome doubling of the remaining (single) genome, resulting in a homozygous diploid. There are numerous examples of genome separation in hybrids (Sybenga 1992), in which centromere behaviour is species dependent, and in which the centromeres of one species are activated later than those of the other species. The late centromeres fail to reach the metaphase plate simultaneously with the early centromeres, and the central space of the anaphase‐telophase group is occupied by chromosomes of the early species. Only the periphery is then available for the late chromosomes. This is reflected by the position of the chromosomes at interphase or mitosis. In extreme cases the late chromosomes do not reach telophase, and are eliminated. This occurs especially in young embryos where rapid divisions require well synchronized centromere activity. This phenomenon is used for producing haploids of one species from hybrids with another species. Spontaneous chromosome doubling is rare, but when the haploids are artificially doubled, homozygous diploids result. In a number of insects, imprinting of the chromosomes of one parent has a comparable effect: one set of chromosomes is eliminated. This mechanism of elimination of one specific genome can not have operated in the particular case considered here, as homozygosity for markers of both parents is recorded. Random loss of (initially) single chromosomes with equivalent centromeres from diploid hybrid nuclei, first re sulting in genetic instability and consequently in rapid loss of other chromosomes until a balanced haploid set remains, is common in some imperfect fungi (Pontecorvo 1958). The haploid state is the natural somatic state, and a series of un balanced mitoses does not present a threat to the very restricted differentiation. If this would occur in hybrid plants, chromosome number doubling would result in homozygous diploid sectors. However, in plants, the diploid state is the natural state and mitosis is normally very stable when the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207