MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105354953 · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-08-0469

Cadherin-Cadherin Engagement Promotes Cell Survival via Rac1/Cdc42 and Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription-3

2009· article· en· W2105354953 on OpenAlexaff
Rozanne Arulanandam, Adina Vultur, Jun Cao, Esther Carefoot, Bruce E. Elliott, Peter Truesdell, Lionel Larue, Hélène Feracci, Leda Raptis

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSTAT3CadherinRAC1STAT proteinCDC42Cell biologyBiologyCancer researchSignal transductionActivator (genetics)CellReceptorGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (Stat3) is activated by a number of receptor and nonreceptor tyrosine kinases, whereas a constitutively active form of Stat3 alone is sufficient to induce neoplastic transformation. In the present report, we show that Stat3 can also be activated through homophilic interactions by the epithelial (E)-cadherin. Indeed, by plating cells onto surfaces coated with fragments encompassing the two outermost domains of this cadherin, we clearly show that cadherin engagement can activate Stat3, even in the absence of direct cell-to-cell contact. Most importantly, our results also reveal for the first time an unexpected and dramatic surge in total Rac1 and Cdc42 protein levels triggered by cadherin engagement and an increase in Rac1 and Cdc42 activity, which is responsible for the Stat3 stimulation observed. Inhibition of cadherin interactions using a peptide, a soluble cadherin fragment, or genetic ablation induced apoptosis, points to a significant role of this pathway in cell survival signaling, a finding that could also have important therapeutic implications. (Mol Cancer Res 2009;7(8):1310-27).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.690

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer ResearchSame topicCytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207