MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106387716 · doi:10.1517/17425250802560279

Pharmacogenetics and the serotonin transporter in late-life depression

2008· review· en· W2106387716 on OpenAlexaff
Philip Gerretsen, Bruce G. Pollock

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSerotonin transporterAntidepressantDepression (economics)PharmacogeneticsParoxetineSerotoninMedicinePsychology5-HTTLPRPsychiatryGenotypeInternal medicineGeneticsBiologyGeneAnxietyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The etiologies of variable antidepressant response remain elusive. Aging and age-related illness add to the complexity and heterogeneity of late-life depression. The serotonin transporter (5-HTT) is the principal site of initial action for several antidepressants, including serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs). The serotonin transporter-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) is the most widely studied polymorphism of the 5-HTT gene, SLC6A4, and is suspected of conferring vulnerability to elderly depression and resistance to treatment. OBJECTIVE: To present an up-to-date account of the influence of 5-HTT polymorphisms on elderly depression, antidepressant response and susceptibility to medication side effects. METHOD: A Medline search (1993 - 2008) of 5-HTT gene variation studies and analyses that included elderly depressed subjects was performed using the terms: 'serotonin transporter'; '5-HTT'; 'SERT'; '5-HTTLPR'; 'late-life depression'; 'elderly depression'; 'geriatric depression'; 'antidepressants' and 'SSRIs'. Reference sections were gleaned for relevant articles that may have been overlooked by the search strategy. CONCLUSION: 5-HTTLPR may influence treatment response variability in late-life depression in a number of ways. Indirectly, 5-HTTLPR seems to influence the likelihood of adverse effects and non-adherence. Directly, the promoter region may contribute to response variability during the initial stages of treatment, which is explained, in part, by a gene-concentration interaction for paroxetine. Subjects with the S allele may be at an increased risk of adverse drug reactions and may require higher initial SSRI plasma concentrations to maximize response. Conversely, patients with the L/L genotype may respond even at lower concentrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & ToxicologySame topicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorFrench-language works237,207