The E4orf6/E1B55K E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Complexes of Human Adenoviruses Exhibit Heterogeneity in Composition and Substrate Specificity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although human adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) has been widely studied, relatively little work has been done with other human adenovirus serotypes. The Ad5 E4orf6 and E1B55K proteins form Cul5-based E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes to degrade p53, Mre11, DNA ligase IV, integrin α3, and almost certainly other targets, presumably to optimize the cellular environment for viral replication and perhaps to facilitate persistence or latency. As this complex is essential for the efficient replication of Ad5, we undertook a systematic analysis of the structure and function of corresponding E4orf6/E1B55K complexes from other serotypes to determine the importance of this E3 ligase throughout adenovirus evolution. E4orf6 and E1B55K coding sequences from serotypes representing all subgroups were cloned, and each pair was expressed and analyzed for their capacity to assemble the Cullin-based ligase complex and to degrade substrates following plasmid DNA transfection. The results indicated that all formed Cullin-based E3 ligase complexes but that heterogeneity in both structure and function existed. Whereas Cul5 was present in the complexes of some serotypes, others recruited primarily Cul2, and the Ad16 complex clearly bound both Cul2 and Cul5. There was also heterogeneity in substrate specificity. Whereas all serotypes tested appeared to degrade DNA ligase IV, complexes from some serotypes failed to degrade Mre11, p53, or integrin α3. Thus, a major evolutionary pressure for formation of the adenovirus ligase complex may lie in the degradation of DNA ligase IV; however, it seems possible that the degradation of as-yet-unidentified critical targets or, perhaps even more likely, appropriate combinations of substrates plays a central role for these adenoviruses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".