Hypoxia Increases Androgen Receptor Activity in Prostate Cancer Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent studies show that prostate cancer cells are able to survive in a hypoxic tumor environment, and the extent of tumor hypoxia correlates with poor clinical outcome. Androgen deprivation, the most common form of prostate cancer therapy, was itself shown to induce a state of transient hypoxia at the microenvironmental level. Because androgen receptor (AR) signaling plays a critical role in prostate cancer, we investigated the effect of hypoxia in regulating AR function. We found that in LNCaP prostate cancer cells, AR binding to the androgen-responsive element (ARE), prostate-specific antigen accumulation, and ARE-reporter gene activity were increased after hypoxia treatment. Hypoxia-enhanced AR function was also observed when AR was exogenously introduced into AR-null DU145 cells. Confocal microscopy and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays showed that AR translocation to the nucleus and AR recruitment to the prostate-specific antigen promoter were facilitated after hypoxia treatment. The AR stimulatory effect seemed to be ligand-dependent because it was abrogated when cells were cultured in an androgen-depleted medium, but was restored with the addition of R1881, a synthetic androgen. The sensitivity of AR activation to R1881 was also increased after hypoxia treatment. Although concentrations of <1 nmol/L R1881 did not induce ARE reporter activity under normoxic conditions, exposure to hypoxia greatly potentiated the AR response to low levels of R1881. Collectively, our results provide compelling evidence that changes in hypoxia/reoxygenation stimulate AR trans-activation and sensitization. The AR-stimulatory effect of an unstable tissue oxygenation milieu of a tumor is likely to contribute to treatment resistance and the emergence of recurrent prostate cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".