Transition nuclear proteins are required for normal chromatin condensation and functional sperm development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The histone-to-protamine transition is important in the formation of spermatozoa. In mammals this involves two steps: replacement of histones by transition nuclear proteins (TPs) and replacement of TPs by protamines. To determine the functions of the TPs and their importance for sperm development, we generated mice lacking both TPs, since mice lacking only TP1 or TP2 were fertile. Our results indicated that TP1 and TP2 had partially complemented each other. In mice lacking both TPs, nuclear shaping, transcriptional repression, histone displacement, and protamine deposition proceeded relatively normally, but chromatin condensation was irregular in all spermatids, many late spermatids showed DNA breaks, and protamine 2 was not posttranslationally processed. Nevertheless, genomic integrity was maintained in mature spermatids, since efficient fertilization and production of offspring were achieved by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. However, many mature spermatids were retained in the testis, epididymal spermatozoa were drastically reduced in number and were highly abnormal, and the mice were sterile. Most epididymal spermatozoa were incapable of fertilization even using intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Thus, in mammals TPs are required for normal chromatin condensation, for reducing the number of DNA breaks, and for preventing the formation of secondary defects in spermatozoa, eventual loss of genomic integrity, and sterility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".