MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112404965 · doi:10.1186/alzrt266

Low levels of cerebrospinal fluid complement 3 and factor H predict faster cognitive decline in mild cognitive impairment

2014· article· en· W2112404965 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jon B. Toledo, Ané Korff, Leslie M. Shaw, John Q. Trojanowski, Jing Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s Research & Therapy · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeMedical Center, University of RochesterNational Institute on AgingUniversity of California, San FranciscoCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchPfizerUniversity of California, Los AngelesNational Institutes of HealthJewish General HospitalUniversity of California, DavisFoundation for the National Institutes of HealthUniversity of Southern CaliforniaEisaiNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationGenentechUniversity of South FloridaUSF Health Byrd Alzheimer's InstituteMcGill UniversityDartmouth CollegeNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationCase Western Reserve UniversityIXICOUniversity of PittsburghUniversity of California, San DiegoJohns Hopkins UniversityCleveland ClinicYork UniversityUniversity of RochesterNorthwestern UniversityBiogenBioClinicaMeso Scale DiagnosticsRush UniversityF. Hoffmann-La RocheUniversity of PennsylvaniaWake Forest UniversityOhio State UniversitySynarcYale UniversityBristol-Myers SquibbMedpaceEmory UniversityAlzheimer's AssociationBrigham and Women's HospitalEli Lilly and CompanyUniversity of California, IrvineGeorgetown UniversityServier
KeywordsNeurologyGeriatric psychiatryCerebrospinal fluidCognitive impairmentCognitionMedicineComplement (music)Cognitive declineFactor HInternal medicineClinical psychologyPsychologyDementiaPsychiatryComplement systemImmunologyDiseaseChemistryAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by the deposition of tau and amyloid in the brain. Although the core cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AD biomarkers amyloid β peptide 1-42 (Aβ1-42), total tau (t-tau) and phosphorylated tau 181 (p-tau181) show good diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, additional biomarkers that can aid in preclinical diagnosis or better track disease progression are needed. Activation of the complement system, a pivotal part of inflammation, occurs at very early stages in the AD brain. Therefore, CSF levels of complement proteins that could be linked to cognitive and structural changes in AD may have diagnostic and prognostic value. METHODS: Using xMAP® technology based assays we measured complement 3 (C3) and factor H (FH) in the CSF of 110 controls (CN), 187 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 92 AD subjects of the AD Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) at baseline. All ADNI participants underwent clinical follow-up at 12 month intervals and MCI subjects had additional visits at 6 and 18 months. The association between CSF biomarkers and different outcome measures were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models (conversion from MCI to AD), logistic regression models (classification of clinical groups) and mixed-effects models adjusted for age, gender, education, t-tau/Aβ1-42 and APOE ϵ4 presence (baseline and longitudinal association between biomarkers and cognitive scores). RESULTS: Although no association was found between the complement proteins and clinical diagnosis or cognitive measures, lower levels of C3 (β = -0.12, p = 0.041) and FH (β = -0.075, p = 0.041) were associated with faster cognitive decline in MCI subjects as measured by the AD Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) test. Furthermore, lower FH levels were associated with larger lateral ventricular volume (p = 0.024), which is indicative of brain atrophy. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms a lack of suitability of CSF C3 and FH as diagnostic biomarkers of AD, but points to their modest potential as prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in cognitively impaired patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.767

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.201
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s Research & TherapySame topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsFrench-language works237,207