MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113826226 · doi:10.1139/v03-077

Intramolecular photosensitization of the pineneocimene rearrangement

2003· article· en· W2113826226 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kevin McMahon, Peter J. Wagner

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsChemistryIntramolecular forceMoietyPineneChromophoreMethylenePhotochemistryKetoneCycloadditionRing (chemistry)Excited stateStereochemistryMedicinal chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bonding of nopol to the para position of acetophenone produces 5,5-dimethyl-2-(2-(p-acetylphenoxy)ethyl)bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene 1, which contains two chromophores: a para-alkoxyacetophenone and an α-pinene, connected by a single methylene group. UV irradiation of 1 in both benzene and methanol produces none of the intramolecular [2 + 2] cycloaddition that most para-(3-buten-1-oxy)acetophenones undergo. Instead, the pinene unit rearranges to a triene skeleton identical to that of ocimene, a known photoproduct of pinene. At modest conversion the diene portion of the triene is cis but gradually is converted to a 52:48 trans:cis ratio. It is concluded that intramolecular triplet energy transfer from the excited ketone chromophore forms the 1,2-biradical triplet state of the pinene moiety, which then undergoes cyclobutylcarbinyl ring opening to a 1,4-biradical that cleaves to the 1,3,6-triene structure of ocimene. This mechanism is suggested to be responsible for the earlier reported intermolecularly sensitized rearrangement of α-pinene to the ocimene isomers.Key words: intramolecular energy transfer, triplet pinene, cyclobutylcarbinyl ring opening, photosensitization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer StudiesFrench-language works237,207