Intramolecular photosensitization of the pineneocimene rearrangement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bonding of nopol to the para position of acetophenone produces 5,5-dimethyl-2-(2-(p-acetylphenoxy)ethyl)bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene 1, which contains two chromophores: a para-alkoxyacetophenone and an α-pinene, connected by a single methylene group. UV irradiation of 1 in both benzene and methanol produces none of the intramolecular [2 + 2] cycloaddition that most para-(3-buten-1-oxy)acetophenones undergo. Instead, the pinene unit rearranges to a triene skeleton identical to that of ocimene, a known photoproduct of pinene. At modest conversion the diene portion of the triene is cis but gradually is converted to a 52:48 trans:cis ratio. It is concluded that intramolecular triplet energy transfer from the excited ketone chromophore forms the 1,2-biradical triplet state of the pinene moiety, which then undergoes cyclobutylcarbinyl ring opening to a 1,4-biradical that cleaves to the 1,3,6-triene structure of ocimene. This mechanism is suggested to be responsible for the earlier reported intermolecularly sensitized rearrangement of α-pinene to the ocimene isomers.Key words: intramolecular energy transfer, triplet pinene, cyclobutylcarbinyl ring opening, photosensitization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".