Effects of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) Flour on Viability of Probiotic Bacteria During Kefir Storage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>Whole ground faba bean was investigated for its capability and efficiency to enhance bacterial survival and growth during kefir storage. Microbial analyses, pH and total titratable acidity (TTA) were measured in kefir samples, containing starter cultures with or without probiotic bacteria, (<em>Lactobacillus acidophilus</em><em> </em>and <em>Bifidobacterium</em><em> </em><em>lactis</em>) supplemented with whole ground faba bean during 28 days cold storage at 4 ºC. Faba bean flour supplementation (4%) stimulated bifidogenic microbial growth, increased titratable acidity linearly from day 1 to 21, and reduced pH during kefir storage. Bacterial count was strongly and positively correlated with lactic acid content and inversely associated with pH. Faba bean contributed to the additive effect on viable cell counts and pH of the probiotic co-culture (<em>Lb. acidophilus </em>and <em>B. lactis</em>), but had a distinct antagonistic effect on titratable acidity of kefir. Hierarchical cluster analysis based on the microbiological, titratable acidity and pH data differentiated kefir corresponding to the presence or absence of faba bean supplementation. Faba bean flour maintain sprobioticst ability and extends kefir shelf life.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".