Bone Affinity of a Bisphosphonate-Conjugated Protein in Vivo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Growth factors capable of stimulating bone formation are potential therapeutic agents for osteoporosis treatment. It is essential, however, that a targeting mechanism is incorporated into the growth factors to deposit them at osseous tissue with minimal distribution to extraskeletal sites. To this end, a strategy has been developed in which a bone-seeking molecule, 1-amino-1,1-diphosphonate methane (aminoBP), was chemically conjugated to a model protein, bovine serum albumin (BSA). This study was carried out to assess the bone affinity of the conjugates in a tibia injection model. Using ovariectomized (OVX) rats, initial (3 h) retention of BSA and aminoBP-BSA were found to be equivalent when injected into the medullary cavity of tibia. After 1 day, an 8- and 12-fold higher tibiae retention of the protein was obtained in normal and OVX rats as a result of aminoBP conjugation. A similar result ( approximately 12-fold difference) was also obtained in OVX rats after 3 days. We concluded that aminoBP conjugation to BSA imparted a high bone affinity and enhanced bone retention of proteins in normal and OVX rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".