MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115922451 · doi:10.1128/aac.00949-15

Effective Inhibition of HIV-1 Production by Short Hairpin RNAs and Small Interfering RNAs Targeting a Highly Conserved Site in HIV-1 Gag RNA Is Optimized by Evaluating Alternative Length Formats

2015· article· en· W2115922451 on OpenAlexafffund
Robert J. Scarborough, Kelsey Adams, Aı̈cha Daher, Anne Gatignol

Bibliographic record

VenueAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchStyrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
KeywordsSmall interfering RNASmall hairpin RNARNA interferenceBiologyRNADicerTrans-acting siRNASmall nucleolar RNAComputational biologyRibozymeMolecular biologyCell biologyGeneticsLong non-coding RNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have previously identified a target site in HIV-1 RNA that was particularly accessible to a ribozyme and a short hairpin RNA (shRNA). To design small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) targeting this site, we evaluated the effects of siRNAs with different lengths on HIV-1 production. The potency and efficacy of these siRNAs were dependent on the length of their intended sense strand with trends for symmetrical and asymmetrical formats that were similar. Although a typical canonical format with a 21-nucleotide (nt) sense strand was effective at inhibiting HIV-1 production, Dicer substrate siRNAs (dsiRNAs) with the longest lengths (27 to 29 nucleotides) were the most effective. Induction of double-stranded RNA immune responses and effects on cell viability were not detected in cells transfected with different siRNAs, suggesting that the differences observed were not related to indirect effects on HIV-1 production. For the corresponding shRNA designs, a different trend in potency and efficacy against HIV-1 production was observed, with the most effective shRNAs having stem lengths from 20 to 27 bp. Our results highlight the importance of evaluating different designs to identify the best siRNA and shRNA formats for any particular target site and provide a set of highly effective molecules for further development as drug and gene therapies for HIV-1 infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAntimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapySame topicRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryFrench-language works237,207