MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116152202 · doi:10.1517/13543784.11.7.991

Bosentan: a dual endothelin receptor antagonist

2002· review· en· W2116152202 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sébastiên Roux, Lewis J. Rubin

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Investigational Drugs · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBosentanEndothelin receptor antagonistMedicineEndothelin receptorPulmonary hypertensionTolerabilityInternal medicineCardiologyPharmacologyReceptorAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The peptide endothelin plays a significant role in a wide array of pathological conditions, including primary pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with collagen vascular disease. These are life-threatening conditions that can severely compromise the function of the lungs and heart. Inhibiting the actions of endothelin by blockade of its receptors provides a new and effective approach to therapy for patients with these conditions. Bosentan (Tracleer ) is the first orally-active dual endothelin receptor antagonist and has recently been approved in the US, Canada, Switzerland and the EU for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Bosentan significantly improves exercise capacity, symptoms and functional status in patients with this disease and also slows clinical deterioration, which may be indicative of a delay of disease progression. Results from large-scale studies of bosentan in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic heart failure have established its long-term safety and tolerability profiles. The introduction of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan has provided an essential treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension and ongoing trials are evaluating its potential role in the management of other endothelin-mediated disease states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.615
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations82
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Investigational DrugsSame topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207